| 单词 | Re-entry |
| 释义 | 重收權 1. Right of a landlord to re-enter premises to terminate a lease for breach of covenant. A lease may contain an express proviso for re-entry or forfeiture by the landlord on specified events, such as non-payment of rent, non-performance or non-observance by the tenant of the covenants of the lease, or the tenant’s bankruptcy (Smith v Gronow [1891] 2 QB 394). A landlord who enters for other reasons than the specified events is liable to be treated as a trespasser: Yelloly v Morley (1910) 27 TLR 20. The landlord may effect right of re-entry by physically entering upon the premises with the intention of determining the tenancy, or by the issue and service of proceedings for the recovery of possession of the premises. In the case of forfeiture for non-payment of rent, the landlord must first make demand for payment unless such requirement is removed by suitable words in the proviso, or by statute: Treseder-Griffin v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1956] 2 QB 127, 2 All ER 33 (CA). Re-entry may also be effected by the landlord’s allowance of a third party into possession as a tenant, or by accepting a subtenant as a tenant under a new tenancy: London & County (A & D) Ltd v Wilfred Sportsman Ltd [1971] Ch 764, [1970] 2 All ER 600 (CA). 2. The right of a landlord to recover possession of premises once a lease has otherwise been terminated. However, the landlord’s right of re-entry is subject to two statutory restrictions under the Public Order Ordinance (Cap 245) s 23(1) and the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance (Cap 7) s 119V(1), (2). Where neither of these restrictions applies, the landlord may simply re-enter, as, for example, where the tenant has abandoned possession (Wildbor v Rainforth (1828) 8 B & C 4) or where there is no residential occupier and the landlord can effect his entry without violence (Williams v Taperell (1892) 8 TLR 241). Re-entry after the determination of the term is merely the exercise of the landlord’s right of property, and is to be distinguished from a re-entry on a default of the tenant which determines or defeats the tenant’s title: Butcher v Poole Corp [1943] KB 48, [1942] 2 All ER 572 (CA). See Breach of covenant; Entry; Landlord; Possession; Relief against forfeiture; Rent; Tenant. 1.因違反契諾而業主終止租約重收樓宇的權利。租約可包含供重收的明示但書或業主在指定的事項上的沒收租賃權，例如不付租金，租客不履行或不遵守租賃契諾，或租客破產 (Smith v Gronow [1891] 2 QB 394)。業主以指定事項上以外的理由進入土地有被視為有侵入者的法律責任：Yelloly v Morley (1910) 27 TLR 20。業主可以終止租賃的意圖親身進入有關的樓宇以行使重收權，或為收回樓宇管有權發出及送達法律程序文件。因應欠繳租金而沒收的案件，業主必須先作出須繳款的要求，除非在但書以適當的語句或成文法則解除此要求：Treseder-Griffin v Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd [1956] 2 QB 127，All ER 33。也可以第三者的款額作為租客可持有樓宇而達致重收權，或以新的租賃接受分租客為租客：London & County (A & D) Ltd v Wilfred Sportsman Ltd [1971] Ch 764， [1970] 2 All ER 600。 2. 只須租約以其他形式終止，業主可追回管有樓宇的權利。但業主的重收權受制於《公安條例》（第245章）第23(1)條和《業主與租客（綜合）條例》》（第7章）第 119V(1)及(2)條。如此兩者皆不適用，業主可簡單地再進入，例如租客已放棄持有(Wildbor v Rainforth (1828) 8 B & C 4)，或例如沒有居住的佔有人及業主可在不用暴力的情況下行使重收權(Williams v Taperell (1892) 8 TLR 241)。在條款終止後的重收權僅是行使業主財物的權利，及不同於因租客欠繳的重收權，可終止或消除租客的業權: Butcher v Poole Corp [1943] KB 48， [1942] 2 All ER 572 （英國上訴法院）。另見 Breach of covenant; Entry; Landlord; Possession; Relief against forfeiture; Rent; Tenant。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。