单词 | Causation in fact |
释义 | 事實上的因由 The question whether a defendant’s breach of duty is an effective cause of the plaintiff’s loss. The test generally used in determining causation is the ‘but for’ test which eliminates all non-causes from consideration: Rainfield Design & Associate Ltd v Siu Chi Moon [2000] 2 HKC 419; Zanda Investment Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Assn [1994] 2 HKC 409. Also known as ‘actual causation’, ‘factual causation’, ‘causation sine qua non’, ‘scientific causation’ and ‘philosophic causation’. See also But for test; Causation; Causation at law. 被告人違反責任是否原告人的損失的實際原因這一問題。以決定因由而採用的驗證為「要不是」驗證方法,淘汰所有非因由而不作考慮:Rainfield Design & Associate Ltd v Siu Chi Moon [2000] 2 HKC 419; Zanda Investment Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Assn [1994] 2 HKC 409。另稱「實際因由」、「事實因由」、「不可缺少的原因」、「精確的因由」及「哲學上的因由」。另見 But for test; Causation; Causation at law。 |
随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条,基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法,是法律学习的有利工具。