| 单词 | Covenant to repair |
| 释义 | 維葺的契諾 A lease provision requiring maintenance of the structural parts of the premises and proper care of the premises during the term of the lease. Unless expressly provided there is no obligation upon a lessor to repair the premises: Cavalier v Pope [1906] AC 428. Exceptions to this are for oral weekly tenancies, and furnished residential premises (which are to be fit for use upon commencement): Mint v Good [1950] 2 All ER 1159, [1951] 1 KB 517; Smith v Marrable (1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 ER 693. There is, subject to any express contrary provision, an implied contractual obligation on the lessee. The extent of this obligation will be determined by the particular matrix of circumstances surrounding the lease: Warren v Keen [1953] 2 All ER 1118, [1954] 1 QB 15. But it will normally include keeping the premises wind and water tight, and making fair and tenantable repairs: Wedd v Porter [1916-17] All ER Rep 803, [1916] 2 KB 91; Cheetham v Hampson (1791) 4 TR 318, 100 ER 1041. It will not usually extend to rebuilding (Torrens v Walker [1904-7] All ER Rep 800, [1906] 2 Ch 166), updating the premises (Saner v Bilton (1878) 7 Ch D 815), or correcting wear and tear (Jeffery v Buckland (1873) 4 AJR 163; Regis Property Co Ltd v Dudley [1958] 3 All ER 491, [1959] AC 370 (HL)). Repairs can be required notwithstanding that they are necessitated by an inherent defect and there is no obligation eradicate the cause: Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Davstone (Holdings) Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 929, [1980] QB 12. See also Fair wear and tear. 一項租約條文，規定於租約有效期內維修處所的結構部分及妥善照管該處所。除有明文規定外，出租人沒有法律責任維葺處所：Cavalier v Pope [1906] AC 428。例外情況有口頭上按周計算的租賃，及備有家具的住用處所（即在生效日期時適合使用）：Mint v Good [1950] 2 All ER 1159, [1951] 1 KB 517; Smith v Marrable (1843) 11 M & W 5, 152 ER 693。除任何明訂的相反條文外，承租人負有合約訂明的隱含責任。該責任的程度將由環繞租約的情況的某特定基體：Warren v Keen [1953] 2 All ER 1118, [1954] 1 QB 15。但通常包括保持該處所不透風及不透水，及作出公正及合租賃狀態的維葺：Wedd v Porter [1916-17] All ER Rep 803, [1916] 2 KB 91; Cheetham v Hampson (1791) 4 TR 318, 100 ER 1041。通常不引伸而適用於重建（Torrens v Walker [1904-7] All ER Rep 800, [1906] 2 Ch 166）、重修處所（Saner v Bilton (1878) 7 Ch D 815）或更正損耗（Jeffery v Buckland (1873) 4 AJR 163; Regis Property Co Ltd v Dudley [1958] 3 All ER 491, [1959] AC 370（上議院））。即使固有的缺陷使維葺成為必需的，及沒有任何責任根除其因由，但亦可規定作出維葺：Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Davstone (Holdings) Ltd [1979] 1 All ER 929, [1980] QB 12。另見 Fair wear and tear。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。