| 单词 | Proviso |
| 释义 | 但書 Lat – provided. 1. A form of words beginning ‘Provided that…’ which is added at the end of a section to limit the operation of the section by adding exceptions. A stipulation which cuts down upon the effect of the main operative part of the instrument which precedes it: Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong, Vol 17, Landlord and Tenant [235.099]. 2. The power of an appellate court, for example, the Court of Appeal, to dismiss an appeal against conviction notwithstanding that it has found that there has been an error or defect in the trial of the appellant: Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Cap 221) s 83(1) proviso; Chan Chuen Ho v HKSAR [1999] 1 HKC 707 (CFA). The proviso allows the appeal to be dismissed where a reasonable jury properly directed would on the evidence have without doubt convinced the appellant: R v Li Wai Keung [1994] 1 HKC 243 (CA); HKSAR v Coady (No 2) [2000] 3 HKC 570 (CA). Another formulation of the general test for when the proviso might be applied is whether, but for the error the subject of appeal, the jury would inevitably have convicted: R v Lam Ming Kwong [1983] 1 HKC 139 (CA); R v Chiang Chui Shun [1985] 2 HKC 377 (CA). See also Miscarriage of justice; Section; Statutory interpretation. 拉丁語 – 但。 1.以「但…」開首的一種形式的語句，加在某分段後的一些例外，用以限制該段的運作。一個條款，它削弱在它前面的文書主運作部份的效果：Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong, 第17冊，業主與租客，第[235.099]段。 2. 審理上訴的法院的權力，舉例，儘管上訴法庭裁定上訴人的審訊中曾出現錯誤或欠妥，它可駁回反對定罪的上訴：《刑事訴訟程序條例》（第221章）第83條的但書；Chan Chuen Ho v HKSAR [1999] 1 HKC 707 （終審法院）。凡合理的陪審團基於該證據，在得到恰當的指示下，也會毫無疑問地將上訴人定罪，該但書即允許上訴被駁回：R v Li Wai Keung [1994] 1 HKC 243 （上訴法院）； HKSAR v Coady (No 2) [2000] 3 HKC 570 （上訴法院）。另一項一般測試的公式法表述為，若非上訴標的的錯誤，陪審團是否無論如何亦會作出定罪： R v Lam Ming Kwong [1983] 1 HKC 139 （上訴法院）; R v Chiang Chui Shun [1985] 2 HKC 377 （上訴法院）。另見 Miscarriage of justice; Section; Statutory interpretation。n. |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。