| 单词 | Variance |
| 释义 | 差異 1. A difference between the information for any offence punishable on summary conviction and the evidence adduced in support. Evidence at variance with particulars should be excluded: Roberts v Dorman Long & Co Ltd [1953] 2 All ER 428, 1 WLR 942 (CA). In every case of an information for any offence punishable on summary conviction, any variance as to the time at or the place in which the offence or act is alleged to have been committed shall not be deemed material, if it is proved that such information was in fact laid within the time limited by law for laying the same, the offence or act is proved to have been committed within the jurisdiction of the magistrate by whom the information is heard and determined: Magistrates Ordinance (Cap 227) s 23(1); HKSAR v Adeola Aremu George [2002] 2 HKLRD 510, 3 HKC 80. If it appears to the adjudicating magistrate that there is variance between the complaint, information or summons and the evidence adduced in support of it, he shall amend the complaint, information or summons if he is satisfied that no injustice would be caused by that amendment or dismiss the complaint, information or summons: s 27(1). 2. A difference between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law. When exercising jurisdiction in any civil cause or matter, the Court of Appeal and the Court of First Instance shall continue to administer law and equity on the basis that, wherever there is any variance between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law with reference to the same matter, the rules of equity shall prevail: High Court Ordinance (Cap 4) s 16(1). The District Court shall also do the same: District Court Ordinance (Cap 336) s 48(2). See also Information; Particulars. 就任何可循簡易程序定罪而判罰的罪行所提供的告發內容，與支持該罪行所援引的證據，兩者之間的分歧。當證據與狀書詳情有分歧時，該證據應予以豁除：Roberts v Dorman Long & Co Ltd [1953] 2 All ER 428, 1 WLR 942 （英國上訴法院）。在每宗可循簡易程序定罪而判罰的罪行的告發案中，只須證明該告發是在法律規定的告發時效內提出，及該項罪行或作為是在負責聆訊及裁定該項告發的裁判官的司法管轄權範圍內發生的，則如對於所指稱的罪行或作為的發生時間或地點有任何差異，均不當作具關鍵性：《裁判官條例》（第227章）第23(1)條；HKSAR v Adeola Aremu George [2002] 2 HKLRD 510。如主審裁判官覺得任何申訴、告發或傳票在內容或形式上有欠妥之處；或申訴、告發或傳票與為支持申訴、告發或傳票而提出的證據之間有任何差異，則他須作如下處理：如他信納對申訴、告發或傳票作出修訂不會造成不公正情況，則須作出修訂；或撤銷申訴、告發或傳票。 2.衡平法規則與普通法規則之間的差異。上訴法庭及原訟法庭在任何民事訟案或事宜中行使司法管轄權時，須繼續按照以下準則施行法律及衡平法：每當就同一事宜衡平法規則與普通法規則之間有任何衝突或歧異，須以衡平法規則為準：高等法院條例（第4章）第16(1)條。區域法院亦須同樣行事：區域法院條例（第336章）第48(2)條。另見 Information; Particulars。 n. |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。