| 单词 | Leading question |
| 释义 | 引導性詰問 Questions which by their form suggest the answer which it is desired the witness shall give: Nicholls v Dowding & Kemp (1815) 1 Stark 81. Questions which assume the existence of facts in issue may not be asked. A question couched in an alternative form may be, but is not necessarily, a leading question: Rowe v Brenton (1828) 3 Man & Ry KB 133. Leading questions may be asked in cross-examination, and must be answered, although it is not permissible to mislead the witness by false assumptions or actual mis-statements: Parkin v Moon (1836) 7 C & P 408; Mechanical and General Inventions Co Ltd and Lehwess v Austin and Austin Motor Co Ltd [1935] AC 346 (HL). Leading questions are not generally permitted in examination in chief and re-examination: Moor v Moor [1954] 2 All ER 458, 1 WLR 927 (CA); Ireland v Taylor [1949] 1 KB 300 (CA). There is nothing wrong with asking leading questions so long as there was no oppression or unfairness: HKSAR v Cheung Yun Kei [2001] 4 HKC 52 (CA). See also Cross-examination; Examination in chief; Objection. 形式上暗示了答案的問題，即希望證人作出的答案：Nicholls v Dowding & Kemp (1815) 1 Stark 81。不可以詢問證人對有爭議事實的存在作出假設的問題。表達兩者擇一的問題，而不一定為引導性詰問則是可以的：Rowe v Brenton (1828) 3 Man & Ry KB 133。在展開盤問時可以詢問證人引導性的詰問，證人並且必須作答，但卻不可以以假的假設或真的錯誤陳述誤導證人：Parkin v Moon (1836) 7 C & P 408; Mechanical and General Inventions Co Ltd and Lehwess v Austin and Austin Motor Co Ltd [1935] AC 346 （上議院）。引導性詰問一般是不可以在主問時詢問證人的：Moor v Moor [1954] 2 All ER 458, 1 WLR 927（英國上訴法院）; Ireland v Taylor [1949] 1 KB 300（英國上訴法院）。只要不存壓迫或沒有不公平，作引導性的詰問並無不妥：HKSAR v Cheung Yun Kei [2001] 4 HKC 52（上訴法院）。另見 Cross-examination; Examination in chief; Objection。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。