| 单词 | Case stated |
| 释义 | 案件呈述 In practice, the parties to the appeal draft the case and submit it to the magistrate: A-G v Leung Chi Kin [1974] HKLR 269; A-G v Kwan Ngan Chung [1981] HKC 439 (HC). The case must be signed by the magistrate: Magistrates Ordinance (Cap 227) s 105. The case stated must set forth the facts and the grounds on which the conviction, order or determination was granted and the grounds on which the proceeding is questioned: s 105. The facts should be stated in a clear and unambiguous fashion: Seymour v King [1954] 38 HKLR 214. The case should state both the primary facts and the inferences drawn from them: A-G v Munro-Smith [1961] HKLR 209 (FC). The case should also include the principles of law upon which the magistrate proceeded and should indicate the law he has applied to the facts: A-G v Munro-Smith, supra; A-G v Tsang Sui Wo (HCMA 250/88, unreported). The point of law and the issue for the opinion of the judge should be stated clearly: R v Chow Ha [1956] 40 HKLR 3. The case should be complete in itself: A-G v Yau Ka Ping [1977] HKLR 76 (CA); A-G v Li Nai Ho [1980] HKLR 792. Also known as ‘stated case’. See also Appeal. 由上訴各方當事人草擬的案件，並呈交予裁判官：A-G v Leung Chi Kin [1974] HKLR 269; A-G v Kwan Ngan Chung [1981] HKC 439（高等法院）。該案件須由裁判官簽署：《裁判官條例》（第227章）第105條。案件呈述須列舉作出該定罪、命令或裁定所據的事實及理由，以及該項法律程序受質疑的理由：第105條。該等理由必須清楚明白地列出：Seymour v King [1954] 38 HKLR 214。案件呈述應列舉基本事實及從基本事實作出的推論：A-G v Munro-Smith [1961] HKLR 209（全體法院）。案件呈述亦應包括裁判官藉以裁決的法律原則，並應表明其應用於有關事實的法律：A-G v Munro-Smith, supra; A-G v Tsang Sui Wo （高等裁判法院上訴1988年第250號，未經彙報）。同時亦應清楚列舉意圖尋求法官意見的法律論點和爭論點：R v Chow Ha [1956] 40 HKLR 3。案件呈述本身應是完整的：A-G v Yau Ka Ping [1977] HKLR 76（上訴法院）；A-G v Li Nai Ho [1980] HKLR 792。另稱「呈述的案件」。另見 Appeal。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。