| 单词 | Causation at law |
| 释义 | 法律上的因由 As with duty of care and breach, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove causation. The court must be satisfied that the cause was the effective cause. The defendant will not be liable unless his conduct has caused the plaintiff’s damage and that damage is not too remote in law: A-G v Ho Hing Mui [1982] 1 HKC 424; Hsu Li Yun v Incorporated Owners of Yuen Fat Building [2000] 2 HKC 365; Tsang Mei Ying v Lam Pak Chiu [2000] 2 HKC 659. See also Causation in fact; Remoteness. 有關謹慎責任及違反事項，原告人負有責任證明因由的存在。法庭必須信納該原因屬實際原因。除非其行為已造成該原告人的損失，及在法律上該損失的可預見程度高，則被告人不須負上法律責任：A-G v Ho Hing Mui [1982] 1 HKC 424; Hsu Li Yun v Incorporated Owners of Yuen Fat Building [2000] 2 HKC 365; Tsang Mei Ying v Lam Pak Chiu [2000] 2 HKC 659。另見 Causation in fact; Remoteness。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。