| 单词 | Presumption of advancement |
| 释义 | 預付財產的推定 The presumption that, where a married person transfers property to his or her spouse who is not the purchaser of the property, the transfer was intended to be a gift: Tinker v Tinker [1970] P 136, 1 All ER 540 (CA). The person providing money was under an obligation to support or make provision for the recipient: Overseas Trust Bank Ltd v Lee See Ching & Anor [1999] 3 HKC 197. The presumption of advancement to a wife no longer carries the weight that it once did: Re Mak Woon Shui, (dec’d) [1992] 2 HKC 144 (CA). The presumption may also arise where the parent of a child makes voluntary disposition of real or personal property: Tsang Chuen v Li Po Kwai [1932] AC 715. However, no presumption of advancement exists when a mother made a purchase of property in her child’s name: Watson v Smith [1998] 3 HKC 461, 2 HKLRD L34 (CA). The presumption of advancement can be rebutted by evidence of a contrary intention: Cheung Lily v Cmr of Estate Duty [1987] 3 HKC 307, 1 HKLR 517. It does not apply to a co-habitee or a de facto husband and wife: Wong Mei Lin v The Personal Representative of the Estate of Lam Leung Ping (dec’d) (HCA 12880/99, unreported). See also Advancement; Resulting trust. 一個已婚的人向其並非財物購買人的配偶轉移財物的推定, 有關轉移擬作為饋贈: Tinker v Tinker [1970] P 136, 1 All ER 540 （上訴法院）。提供款項的人有責任支持受贈人或為其訂立條文: Overseas Trust Bank Ltd v Lee See Ching & Anor [1997] HKLY 465 。對妻子預付財產的推定再不如以前般有影響力: Re Mak Woon Shui, (dec’d) [1992] 2 HKC 144 （上訴法院）。凡兒童的父母作出土地財產或動產的無償產權處置, 有關的推定也可能出現: Li Po Kwai v Tsang Chuen (1930) 24 HKLR 61。但如母親以其子女的名義購買物業, 則不會有預付財產的推定: Watson v Smith [1998] 3 HKC 461, 2 HKLRD L34 （上訴法院）。預付財產的推定可被相反意圖的證據反駁: Cheung Lily v Cmr of Estate Duty [1988] 3 HKC 307, 1 HKLR 517。不適用於同居者或事實上的夫妻: Wong Mei Lin v The Personal Representative of the Estate of Lam Leung Ping (dec’d) （高院民事訴訟1999年第12880號）。另見 Advancement; Resulting trust。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。