| 单词 | Proprietary estoppel |
| 释义 | 所有人不容反悔 An equity binding the owner of property who induces another person to assume or expect that an interest in that property will be obtained by or conferred on that person, where that person relies on that assumption or expectation and alters their position to their detriment: Bestkey Development Ltd v Incorporated Owners of the Mansion & Anor [1999] 3 HKC 275 (CA). Proprietary estoppel as a ground for resisting the claim of legal owner to deprive the partner or co-habitee of the beneficial interest of the property is now considered very akin to the principle of constructive trust. There must be a clear and unequivocal representation made by the plaintiff to the defendant: Lea Tai Property Development Ltd v Incorporated Owners of Leapoint Industrial Building [1996] 1 HKC 193 (CA). Whether the principle is called proprietary estoppel, estoppel by acquiescence or estoppel by encouragement has been said to be really immaterial: Kung Wong Sau Hin v Sze to Chun Keung [1996] 2 HKC 616; Ton Tim Nui v Hong Kong Housing Authority [1999] 4 HKC 466 (CA). See also Detriment; Equitable estoppel; Estoppel; Promissory estoppel; Reliance. 指財產所有人誘使另一人並使他以為或期望可獲得或可被賦予財產的產權，而因依賴該假設或期望，該另一人改變自己的位置並產生不利者，衡平法對該名財產所有人所作出的約束：Bestkey Development Ltd v Incorporated Owners of the Mansion & Anor [1999] 3 HKC 275 （上訴法院）。所有權不容反悔作為一項理由，抗拒法律所有人要剝奪合夥人或同居人就財產的實益權益的申索，現被視為與法律構定信託相近。原告人必須曾清晰及不含糊地向被告人表示：Lea Tai Property Development Ltd v Incorporated Owners of Leapoint Industrial Building [1996] 1 HKC 193 （上訴法院）。有說不論此原則被稱為所有人不容反悔，或因默許不容反悔或因鼓勵不容反悔，並沒有實質的分別：Kung Wong Sau Hin v Sze to Chun Keung [1996] 2 HKC 616; Ton Tim Nui v Hong Kong Housing Authority [1999] 4 HKC 466 （上訴法院）。另見 Detriment; Equitable estoppel; Estoppel; Promissory estoppel; Reliance。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。