单词 | Recalling a witness |
释义 | 再度傳召證人 In a proceeding before a court, to call again with the court’s leave a person to give evidence who has already given evidence in the proceeding. A court may at any time recall a witness who has already given evidence to ask him further questions: Fallon v Calvert [1960] 2 QB 201, 1 All ER 281 (CA). However, in a civil suit he may not recall a witness except with the consent of, or perhaps in the absence of objection from, the parties: Re Enoch and Zaretzky, Bock & Co’s Arbitration [1910] 1 KB 327 (CA). The parties themselves, except where they call evidence in rebuttal, may only recall a witness at the judge’s discretion: Burgess v Burgess [1958] 2 All ER 63, 1 WLR 608. Where a witness is recalled and asked a question by the judge the other party should be allowed to cross-examine on the point and to call rebutting evidence: R v Howarth (1918) 13 Cr App Rep 99 (CCA). See also Examination in chief; Witness. 在法院前進行的法律程序,在法院的許可下再次傳召在法律程序中已作證的人。法院可在任何時間再度傳召已作證的證人以進一步詢問他問題:Fallon v Calvert [1960] 2 QB 201,1 All ER 281 (英國上訴法院)。但在民事訴訟則不可傳召證人,除得到當事人的同意外或在沒有當事人的反對下:Re Enoch and Zaretzky, Bock & Co’s Arbitration [1910] 1 KB 327(英國上訴法院)。除當事人傳召反駁證據外,當事人自己只可在法官的酌情權下再度傳召證人:Burgess v Burgess [1958] 2 All ER 63n, 1 WLR 608。如證人再度被法官傳召及詢問,應允許另一方盤問有關的論點及傳召反駁證據:R v Howarth (1918) 13 Cr App Rep 99(英國刑事上訴法院)。另見 Examination in chief; Witness。 |
随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条,基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法,是法律学习的有利工具。