| 单词 | Interlocutory injunction |
| 释义 | 非正審強制令 An injunction ordered by a court before the court makes a final order in the proceedings. In general, an interlocutory injunction will follow as quickly as possible upon the issue of the writ, directing the defendant to do or refrain from doing something until the trial of the action. An interlocutory injunction may either be prohibitory or mandatory: High Court Ordinance (Cap 4) s 21L; The Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) O 29 rr 1-8. An applicant for an interlocutory injunction must show that (1) there is a serious question to be tried; (2) damages will not be an adequate remedy unless an injunction is granted; and (3) the balance of convenience lies in favour of granting an injunction: Yeko Trading Ltd v Chow Sai Cheong Tong & Ors [2000] 2 HKC 612 (CFI); Target Newspapers Ltd & Ors v Narain [1989] 2 HKC 16 (CA). An order granting an interlocutory injunction may be made either unconditionally or conditional upon the plaintiff giving an undertaking to pay damages to the defendant for any loss suffered as a result of the injunction if it subsequently transpires that the injunction should not have been granted: American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396, 1 All ER 504 (HL); Chinapro Ltd v Century Fame Ltd [1993] 1 HKLR 234 (CA). See also Anton Piller order; Balance of convenience; Final injunction; Injunction; Interlocutory nature; Interlocutory order; Interlocutory proceedings; Mareva injunction; Undertaking. Tort - An injunction obtained for a temporary period only pending the settlement of a dispute. An interlocutory injunction may be granted where injury was already been caused and will otherwise continue, or where it has not yet been caused but is imminently threatened: Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong, Vol 25, Tort [380.064]. An interlocutory injunction will not be granted in malicious falsehood, as in defamation, if the defendant asserts that his words were true or puts forward some other recognised defence, unless the court is satisfied at the interlocutory stage that the plaintiff’s claim is bound to succeed: Chan Shui Shing Andrew v Iron Wing Holdings Ltd [2001] 2 HKC 376 (CFI). See also Nuisance. 由法院在作出該等法律程序的最終命令前所作的強制令。一般而言，「非正審強制令」會在發出令狀後盡快作出，指示被告人在訴訟進行審訊前須作出或不作出某項行為。此等強制令可屬禁止式或強制性：《高等法院條例》（第4章）第21L條；《高等法院規則》（第4A章）第29號命令第1至8條規則。「非正審強制令」的申請人必須證明(1)有一項認真問題需要審訊；(2)除非授予強制令，否則損害賠償不會作為足夠的補救方法；及(3)經衡量方便後，贊成授予強制令：Yeko Trading Ltd v Chow Sai Cheong Tong & Ors [2000] 2 HKC 612（高等法院原訴庭）；Target Newspapers Ltd & Ors v Narain [1989] 2 HKC 16（上訴法院）。授予「非正審強制令」的命令可無條件或附條件作出，後者指原告人承諾如其後發現不應授予強制令，會就被告人因該項強制令而蒙受的任何損失，向被告人繳付損害賠償：American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396, 1 All ER 504（上議院）；Chinapro Ltd v Century Fame Ltd [1993] 1 HKLR 234（上訴法院）。另見 Anton Piller order; Balance of convenience; Final injunction; Injunction; Interlocutory nature; Interlocutory order; Interlocutory proceedings; Mareva injunction; Undertaking。 侵權 - 在某項爭議待決期間所取得的暫時強制令。如傷害已發生及會持續發生，或即使傷害尚未發生但已受逼切威脅，則可能授予「非正審強制令」：Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong, 第25冊，侵權，第[380.064]段。在惡意虛假的個案中，如被告人堅稱其語言文字是正確，或提出其他獲承認的免責辯護，則法院不會授予「非正審強制令」（跟誹謗案一樣）；但如法院在非正審階段已信納原告人的申索必會成功，則屬例外：Chan Shui Shing Andrew v Iron Wing Holdings Ltd [2001] 2 HKC 376（高等法院原訴庭）。另見 Nuisance。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。