| 单词 | Words of limitation |
| 释义 | 限制性文字 1. Words used to define the interest being disposed of, for example, an easement granted (Wisename Ltd v S-J [1998] 1 HKLRD 71); or words expressing a condition (Pelham-Clinton v Duke of Newcastle [1903] AC 111 (HL)). Technical terms are to be construed in their legal and technical sense when constructing an executed trust. If technical terms were used in the deed, the limitations must be construed as if they were limitations of the legal estate, and thus the absence of appropriate technical words of limitation would be fatal: Re Gillies’ Settlement, Archer v Penney [1917] 2 Ch 205. If, however, in such a deed strict phraseology was not used, the court may give effect to the settlor’s intention, so that, for example, the equitable estate would pass, even though no apt words of limitation were used: Re Bostock’s Settlement, Norrish v Bostock [1921] 2 Ch 469 (CA). 2. Words used to define the reasonable or normal hour for completion to take place, ie within office hour of a solicitor firm: Camberra Investment Ltd v Chan Wai-tak [1989] 1 HKLR 568. See also Completion; Easement. 1. 用以界定被處置的權益的文字，例子有批予的地役權（Wisename Ltd v S-J [1998] 1 HKLRD 71）；顯示條件的文字（Pelham-Clinton v Duke of Newcastle [1903] AC 111 (HL)）。在解釋已生效的信託時，技術性的名詞會按它們在法律上及技術上的含義解釋，如技術性的名詞使用在該契據上，它們必須作限制法律上的產權解釋，因此沒有適當的限制性技術文字，後果會是重大的：Re Gillies’ Settlement, Archer v Penney [1917] 2 Ch 205。但假如該契據沒有用上嚴格的措詞，法庭可使財產授予人的意願生效，舉例，就算沒有用上恰當的限制性文字，衡平法產業權仍得以轉移：Re Bostock’s Settlement, Norrish v Bostock [1921] 2 Ch 469（英國上訴法院）。 2.用作界定合理或正常的完成買賣時間，即在律師行的辦公時間內：Camberra Investment Ltd v Chan Wai-tak [1989] 1 HKLR 568。另見 Completion; Easement。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。