| 单词 | Pure economic loss |
| 释义 | 純經濟損失 Financial loss suffered by a plaintiff which does not flow from any damage to his own person or property, but through a web of economic relationships in which the plaintiff is involved: Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong, Vol 25, Tort [380.103]. It is not generally considered to be fair and just to allow recovery for economic loss however foreseeable it may have been: Murphy v Brentwood [1991] 1 AC 398, [1990] 2 All ER 908 (HL). However, there are a number of situations where a pure economic loss is recoverable when it is truly consequent upon injury to the person or damage to the plaintiff’s property: Marc Rich & Co AG v Bishop Rock Marine Co Ltd, the Nicholas H [1996] AC 211, [1995] 3 All ER 307 (HL). Generally, courts will only allow recovery for pure economic loss where it can be said that the defendant has assumed a responsibility to the plaintiff and that the imposition of a duty would be fair (ie it would provide the plaintiff with adequate protection without undermining other legal principles or remedies): Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473, 1 All ER 163 (PC); White v Jones [1995] 2 AC 207, 1 All ER 691 (HL). See also Damages; Negligent misrepresentation; Professional advice. 由原告蒙受的財政損失， 並非出於對原告身體或財物的任何損害， 而是透過原告牽涉的經濟關係網絡: Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong, 第25冊，侵權，第[380.103]段。一般不被視為公平， 及無論有多可預見， 只為准予追討經濟損失: Murphy v Brentwood [1991] 1 AC 398, [1990] 2 All ER 908 （上議院）。 但在數種情況下，可予追討純經濟損失， 就是有真正由對人的傷害或對原告財物的損害而招致的經濟損失: Marc Rich & Co AG v Bishop Rock Marine Co Ltd, the Nicholas H [1995] 3 All ER 307 （上議院）。 一般而言， 如可說被告已假設有對原告的責任及加諸一項責任會公平 （即在沒有破壞其他法律原則或補救的情況下提供原告足夠的保障），法院才會容許追討純經濟損失,: Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473, 1 All ER 163 (樞密阮); White v Jones [1995] 2 AC 207, 1 All ER 691 (上議院)。另見 Damages; Negligent misrepresentation; Professional advice。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。