| 单词 | Deep pocket argument |
| 释义 | 「深口袋」論點 In tort, the notion that a defendant, by virtue of its big standing and strong financial backing or ‘deep pocket’ is best able to bear a loss and therefore should do so even in situations where it is not at fault. It is a justification offered for the attribution of vicarious liability in certain situations, such as an employer’s liability for the actions of an employee: Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes [1976] 1 All ER 779, 2 WLR 262 (CA). See also Fault; Public policy; Vicarious liability. 就侵權法的假定而言，指憑藉被告人的重要地位及雄厚資金或「深口袋」，他／她是最能夠承擔損失的人，即使在他／她並無錯失的情況亦然。在若干情況中，此論點成為歸咎轉承法律責任的一項充分理由，例如僱主為其僱員的行為負有法律責任：Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes [1976] 1 All ER 779，2 WLR 262 （英國上訴法院）。另見 Fault; Public policy; Vicarious liability。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。