单词 | Re-hearing |
释义 | 再次聆訊 A form of appeal in which the issues arising at the proceedings, the subject of the appeal, may be reargued on appeal whether they be issues of fact or law. The appeal court may allow material not before the trial court to be introduced on the appeal but generally only after leave of the court has been granted: Costa v Cockburn Salvage and Trading Pty Ltd (1970) 44 ALJR 455. This is what distinguishes such an appeal from a retrial or hearing de novo. An appeal from the master is dealt with by the judge in chambers by way of a re-hearing of the initial summons or application: Killenny Ltd v A-G [1996] 1 HKC 30 (CA). In an appeal from a master by way of a re-hearing it is very common for new points to be taken: El Vince Ltd v Wu Wen Sheng [2001] 4 HKC 107, 3 HKLRD 445. The hearing of an appeal by the Court of Appeal is by way of re-hearing: The Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) O 59 r 3(1). These words do not mean that the Court of Appeal literally ‘re-hears’ the case, and that the parties have to start afresh as they did in the court below or that the witnesses are heard afresh (Quilter v Mapleson (1882) 9 QBD 672 (CA), but rather that the court will re-hear the case on the documents, including the transcript of the evidence or the judge’s notes (Powell v Streatham Manor Nursing Home [1935] AC 243 (HL)). The Court of Appeal has no power to re-hear an appeal after its order has been passed and entered: Barnett v Port of London Authority (No 2) [1913] 2 KB 115 (CA). See also De novo; Retrial. 上訴的形式,即可在上訴再爭辯在法律程序產生的無論是事實或法律上的爭論點(即上訴的主題)。一般只在授予法庭許可之後,上訴法庭才可准許在上訴提出在審判法院沒有採用的資料:Costa v Cockburn Salvage and Trading Pty Ltd (1970) 124 CLR 192。這因而有別於重審。自司法聆案官的上訴,由法官在內庭以再次聆訊最初的傳召或申請的方式處理:Killenny Ltd v A-G [1996] 1 HKC 30 (上訴法庭)。以再次聆訊方式進行的自司法聆案官的上訴,非常普遍會作出新的論點:El Vince Ltd v Wu Wen Sheng [2001] 4 HKC 107, 3 HKLRD 445。在上訴法庭進行的上訴聆訊,須以再次聆訊的方式進行:《高等法院規則》(第4A章)第59號命令第3(1)規則。這些文字並不表示上訴法庭原義是「再次聆訊」有關案件,及有關的當事人須一如在下級法院般重新開始,或重新對證人進行聆訊 (Quilter v Mapleson (1882) 9 QBD 672 (英國上訴法院),但法院卻會就有關的文件再次進行聆訊,包括證據的謄本或法官的紀錄(Powell v Streatham Manor Nursing Home [1935] AC 243(上議院))。在上訴法庭的命令過時及記下之後,上訴法庭沒有再次聆訊上訴的權力:Barnett v Port of London Authority (No 2) (1913) 82 LJKB 918(上訴法院)。另見 De novo; Retrial。 |
随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条,基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法,是法律学习的有利工具。