| 单词 | Slander of title |
| 释义 | 所有權誹謗 To falsely and maliciously disparage the title of an owner of real or personal property, and by doing so, unless the circumstances of the case bring it within the statutory exceptions, causes him special damage: Loudon v Ryder (No 2) [1953] Ch 423, 1 All ER 1005. The actions for slander of goods and slander of title, formerly regarded as separate causes of action, are now viewed as examples of the general tort of malicious falsehood: Defamation Ordinance (Cap 21) s 24(1). In an action of slander of title, it shall not be necessary to allege or prove special damage if the words upon which the action is founded are calculated to cause pecuniary damage to the plaintiff and are published in writing or other permanent form; or if the said words are calculated to cause pecuniary damage to the plaintiff in respect of any office, profession, calling, trade or business held or carried on by him at the time of the publication: Defamation Ordinance (Cap 21) s 24(1). For an action to lie, the nature of the property or the nature of the plaintiff’s interest in the property the title of which is disparaged is immaterial. The burden of proving falsity, publication in disparagement of the plaintiff’s title, malice and, where necessary, special damage is on the plaintiff: Royal Baking Powder Co v Wright Crossley & Co (1900) 18 RPC 95 (HL). See also Injurious falsehood; Malice. 虛假地及惡意地詆毀土地或非土地財產擁有人的所有權，有關的行為導致當事人特殊損害，除非案件的情況在法定例外的範圍之內，否則須負有法律責任：Loudon v Ryder (No 2) [1953] Ch 423, 1 All ER 1005。貨品誹謗和所有權誹謗的訴訟過往被視為各別的訴訟因由，但現已被視為一般惡意虛假侵權的例子：《誹謗條例》(第21章)第24(1)條。如據以提出該宗訴訟的言詞是刻意導致原告人蒙受金錢損失，而該等言詞並以書面或其他永久形式發布者；或上述言詞是刻意導致原告人在該等言詞發布時所擔任或從事的任何職位、專業、職業、行業或業務方面蒙受金錢損失者，則在所有權誹謗的任何訴訟中，均無須指稱或證明特殊損害：《誹謗條例》（第21章）第24(1)條。為使申索成立，所有權被詆毀的財產的性質或原告在財產的權益的性質無關重要。原告有責任證明虛假，詆毀原告所有權的公布，惡意，及特殊損害（如有需要）：Royal Baking Powder Co v Wright Crossley & Co (1900) 18 RPC 95 （上議院）。另見 Injurious falsehood; Malice。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。