| 单词 | Lost modern grant |
| 释义 | 現代授權證書遺失原則 A legal fiction invented to allow creation of an easement by prescription where one cannot be established to the length of time required under common law. A presumption is made of the grant of the easement to the owner of the dominant tenement by the owner of the servient tenement in a deed made in more recent times after 1189, which has since been lost but had been long enjoyed pursuant to that grant. This method is not possible in Hong Kong as the user relevant to establish a prescriptive right to an easement must be a user by or on behalf of a fee simple owner against another fee simple owner: Chung Yeung Hung & Ors v Law Man Nga & Anor (t/a Constant Rich Investment Co [1997] 2 HKC 406, HKLRD 1022 (CA); Tang Tim Fat & Anor v Chan Fok Kei [1992] 2 HKC 623, [1993] 2 HKLR 373 (HC). Moreover, the Prescription Act 1832 (UK) no longer apply in Hong Kong as the Application of English Law Ordinance (Cap 88) has been in effect repealed. See also Dominant tenement; Easement; Prescription; Unity of possession. 法律上的推定，以便當地役權因普通法規定的期限而不能設立時，以時效歸益權而得以設立。就1189年後的較近期所簽訂的契據，會假設地役權由供役地所有人向需役地所人有批出，雖然其後失去了，但在失去前一直依據批出被享用著。這個取得地役權的方法在香港不適用，因為設立地役權的時效歸益權之有關使用，必須是由永久產權所有人或代表永久產權所有人，針對另一永久產權所有人所作的使用：Chung Yeung Hung & Ors v Law Man Nga & Anor (t/a Constant Rich Investment Co [1997] 2 HKC 406, HKLRD 1022（上訴法院）；Tang Tim Fat & Anor v Chan Fok Kei [1992] 2 HKC 623, [1993] 2 HKLR 373 （高等法院）。再者，1832年的英國《時效歸益權法》因為《英國法律應用條例》（第88章）而已實際被廢除，並不適用於香港。另見 Dominant tenement; Easement; Prescription; Unity of possession。 |
| 随便看 |
|
法律词典收录了8080条英汉双解法律词条，基本涵盖了常用法律英语单词及短语词组的翻译及用法，是法律学习的有利工具。